🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard women from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish laws and support services to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a major setback for women's rights.

Political Debate and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked broad protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian appeal calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds support, the head of state could possibly return the bill for additional review if he holds objections.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could affect comparable debates in additional EU countries