🔗 Share this article

Within the beginning sections of Authentic: The Myth of Bringing Your Full Self to Work, writer Burey issues a provocation: everyday directives to “be yourself” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are not harmless encouragements for individuality – they can be pitfalls. Burey’s debut book – a mix of personal stories, research, cultural critique and interviews – aims to reveal how companies appropriate personal identity, transferring the responsibility of corporate reform on to staff members who are already vulnerable.

Personal Journey and Larger Setting

The impetus for the work lies partially in Burey’s own career trajectory: multiple jobs across retail corporations, startups and in international development, viewed through her background as a woman of color with a disability. The conflicting stance that Burey faces – a push and pull between standing up for oneself and aiming for security – is the engine of her work.

It arrives at a moment of general weariness with corporate clichés across America and other regions, as opposition to DEI initiatives grow, and numerous companies are scaling back the very systems that previously offered change and reform. The author steps into that terrain to assert that retreating from the language of authenticity – that is, the corporate language that minimizes personal identity as a grouping of aesthetics, quirks and pastimes, forcing workers preoccupied with handling how they are seen rather than how they are handled – is not a solution; we must instead reframe it on our personal terms.

Marginalized Workers and the Display of Self

Through detailed stories and conversations, Burey illustrates how underrepresented staff – people of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, women, employees with disabilities – soon understand to modulate which persona will “pass”. A vulnerability becomes a liability and people compensate excessively by working to appear palatable. The effort of “bringing your full self” becomes a projection screen on which all manner of assumptions are cast: emotional labor, revealing details and constant performance of gratitude. According to Burey, employees are requested to expose ourselves – but without the safeguards or the trust to survive what comes out.

According to the author, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but without the protections or the confidence to endure what comes out.’

Case Study: The Story of Jason

Burey demonstrates this dynamic through the account of an employee, a deaf employee who decided to inform his team members about deaf community norms and communication norms. His eagerness to share his experience – a gesture of transparency the office often praises as “sincerity” – temporarily made daily interactions smoother. Yet, the author reveals, that progress was fragile. When staff turnover wiped out the unofficial understanding the employee had developed, the atmosphere of inclusion vanished. “All of that knowledge went away with the staff,” he comments exhaustedly. What remained was the weariness of being forced to restart, of being made responsible for an institution’s learning curve. From the author’s perspective, this is what it means to be told to reveal oneself lacking safeguards: to endanger oneself in a structure that celebrates your transparency but declines to codify it into policy. Genuineness becomes a pitfall when institutions count on personal sharing rather than institutional answerability.

Literary Method and Idea of Resistance

Burey’s writing is both lucid and lyrical. She marries intellectual rigor with a tone of solidarity: an invitation for followers to engage, to question, to oppose. For Burey, workplace opposition is not overt defiance but moral resistance – the practice of opposing uniformity in settings that expect gratitude for simple belonging. To resist, according to her view, is to interrogate the narratives companies narrate about fairness and acceptance, and to reject involvement in customs that maintain inequity. It could involve naming bias in a gathering, opting out of voluntary “diversity” labor, or defining borders around how much of oneself is offered to the company. Opposition, she suggests, is an declaration of personal dignity in environments that frequently praise compliance. It is a habit of integrity rather than opposition, a method of insisting that an individual’s worth is not dependent on institutional approval.

Restoring Sincerity

She also refuses inflexible opposites. The book avoids just discard “sincerity” entirely: rather, she calls for its reclamation. According to the author, sincerity is not simply the unfiltered performance of individuality that organizational atmosphere often celebrates, but a more intentional harmony between individual principles and individual deeds – an integrity that opposes alteration by institutional demands. Rather than considering authenticity as a requirement to disclose excessively or adjust to sterilized models of transparency, the author encourages readers to preserve the aspects of it rooted in truth-telling, individual consciousness and principled vision. In her view, the goal is not to abandon genuineness but to move it – to move it out of the executive theatrical customs and into interactions and offices where reliance, fairness and accountability make {